Please move to the latest version of the Imms Admin Analysis Tool, v2.1 (released April 2023). Older versions will not work properly!
Update: announcing v1.2 of the Imms Admin Analysis Tool. I've used it in my consulting almost weekly since I put it together and...whew, I've found some things! My own experience combined with some excellent user suggests has led to this update. Please give me feedback or questions!
Warning: I am introducing a quick-and-dirty little imms analysis tool. Emphasis on dirty. This might lead to more questions than answers. Be forewarned.
As you can imagine, I do a lot of pediatric productivity analysis and find an endless number of angles at which to slice and dice the data. Every new practice I work with teaches me something.
For example, I've always quickly eyeballed each practice's vaccine volume and administrative coding. I finally sat down and spent 15min making a spreadsheet that will tell me if there's a "leak" somewhere. Are there vaccines being given, but coded incorrectly? Are there vaccines being given and not being coded at all? Thanks to VFC and the 90471/2/3 set, this spreadsheet can't do a perfect job telling us everything we need to know, but it's a start. It has helped me catch practices who aren't billing all of the possible component based admins.
This tool is somewhat like the RVU calculator. You need to gather some data, drop it into the spreadsheet, and then it tells you something. The data you need to gather is very simple: a list of your immunization-based CPT codes and their unit volume. You can include all your CPTs in the data, the spreadsheet will do the work for you.
Here are the step-by-steps:
CPT-5 | Units |
90460 | 6381 |
90461 | 3403 |
90471 | 2443 |
90472 | 100 |
90651 | 564 |
90670 | 736 |
90680 | 503 |
90685 | 630 |
90686 | 2543 |
What do the results tell us? Columns G+H provide the analysis.
Here's an example of what it might look like:
Why would the numbers differ? I've seen a number of reasons.
If the Total Imms are greater than the Total Primary Admins:It's not possible for the spreadsheet to make sure you have your 90460/90461 distribution correct, but you can make a quick estimate to see if you're far off. It's not going to spot the one time you missed a 90461 on a Pentacel but if you are always missing one on your MMR, it might. Let's see if I can describe this...First, most of the time, 90471s are used for flu shots. Not always, of course, but if you quickly add your 90471 totals to your 90460 totals and pretend for a minute, you can compare the results in G9 and H9 to see if you're in the ballpark. It's far from accurate or perfect, but I've used this trick to find some leaks - when this quick check doesn't work, I start digging and lo and behold! The practice hasn't been billing TdaPs right or something.
Play with this. See what you get. Tell me where it's broken or how I can improve it.
The Quick And Dirty Imms Admin Anaylsis Tool, 2019.